data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fbb5/0fbb5fef92a843e6419a7f41c676d169c1d269fb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b75b/1b75bbb41de8dc4d375927dc1de2b47c407f875f" alt=""
That particular
circumstance aside, there is a huge debate going on as to why there is such a
massive fluctuation in vegetable prices, which are not always exactly
predictable, year on year. The crate issue is not the main reason. After all
only a total of 25 fruit and vegetables require to be transported by crates.
That is peanuts in comparison to over 100 varieties.
Many of the
price increases are on vegetables that do not even require crates, though
obviously there is an added cost involved in crate transport, not covered by
lower post harvest losses. Ironically due to the political sensitivity of the
farm lobby, the crate law does not apply farmers. That at a stroke reduces the
benefit of the crate law in the first place as there is a substantial loss in
transport from the farm gate to the main wholesalers at Economic Zones where
they are first transported to.
In today’s
context the drought is bigger factor, as it is across the country and not restricted
to an area. The only people likely to benefit from this are people who were
able to grow vegetables in their home gardens, use available water from home
wells to grow their vegetables for home consumption and therefore save on
market prices, which mean they will now be able to eat, that which they were
priced out of. Good for them!
It is clear that
farmers have not been able to weather proof their production, and due to lower
yields will not benefit from price increases.
No comments:
Post a Comment